1. Content types and relationships
Identify the records, fields, relationships and reusable data structures needed to represent the content accurately.
I build bespoke content management systems around your content model, editing workflows and publishing requirements. When WordPress or another established CMS is not the right fit, a custom platform can provide the structure, controls and integrations your team needs.
A standard CMS works well for many websites. A bespoke content management system may be a better fit when your content has complex relationships, specialised approval steps or a publishing interface tailored to a particular team.
I design content types, fields and relationships around the information you publish and maintain. Editors can work with structured records and purpose-built screens rather than navigating controls that do not match the job.
A custom CMS can include editorial permissions, review workflows, scheduled publishing, revision history, content APIs, search and integrations. The exact functionality depends on the publishing requirements and the systems that need to consume the content.
If your website already runs on WordPress, I will consider whether custom post types, fields, plugins or a tailored administration interface can solve the problem. A separate CMS is worth considering when the content-management application has requirements that are better served by a dedicated architecture.
I also account for existing content, URL structures, metadata, access permissions and future maintenance. If content needs to reach websites, mobile applications or other services, I can assess how it should be exposed and kept consistent across those destinations.
A standard content management system suits many websites, but more specialised requirements can make everyday publishing difficult. Editors may need to manage related records, repeatable data, multiple approval stages or content that is reused across several websites and applications.
When the editing interface does not reflect the underlying information, teams can end up relying on spreadsheets, duplicated records and manual checks to keep content consistent.
I develop custom CMS software around the information your team manages and the way content moves from creation to publication. That might mean a structured editorial platform, a content API for multiple applications or a purpose-built administration system for a specialised business.
A bespoke content management system can combine structured records, purpose-built editing screens, validation, review states and publishing interfaces in one application.
I would first assess whether WordPress or another established CMS can meet the requirements through configuration, custom development or integrations. A bespoke platform makes sense when the content model and workflow justify the additional ownership.
The quality of a CMS depends on more than its editing screens. I define how content is structured, validated, approved, delivered and maintained before settling on the implementation.
Identify the records, fields, relationships and reusable data structures needed to represent the content accurately.
Define how content moves through drafting, review, approval, publication and subsequent revisions.
Set access by role and decide which changes need an audit trail or additional approval.
Define how editors find records, filter large collections, manage relationships and identify incomplete content.
Determine which websites, mobile applications or external services need access to published content.
Assess existing content, metadata, relationships, files and URLs before planning a move to a new CMS.
Consider content volume, query patterns, caching, testing, deployment and future changes to the model.
Walk through a real publishing task, from creating a record to approval and publication. The details reveal whether an existing CMS can be adapted or a custom platform is justified.
| Question to ask | A basic approach | A more considered solution |
|---|---|---|
| How are content types defined? | Add the fields editors request. | Model relationships, validation, reusable structures and future content requirements. |
| Who can approve publication? | Give editors permission to publish pages. | Define roles, review states, approval responsibilities and revision history. |
| Could WordPress meet the requirement? | Assume a custom platform is more flexible. | Compare the actual content model and workflows against WordPress and other suitable CMS options. |
| How is content reused across applications? | Copy content into each destination. | Define a source of truth and suitable APIs or other interfaces for consuming published content. |
| How are changes and revisions handled? | Overwrite the existing record. | Define revision history, review requirements, restoration and the impact of changes on published content. |
| How do editors find related records? | Search by title or browse a list. | Support relevant filters, relationships, sorting and navigation based on the content model. |
| How will existing content be migrated? | Import text and images from the old system. | Map fields and relationships, validate content, handle exceptions and check URLs and metadata. |
| How will publishing errors be identified? | Investigate when someone reports a problem. | Define validation, error reporting and monitoring for important publishing and integration workflows. |
| Who maintains the platform after launch? | Arrange support if something breaks. | Plan updates, backups, testing, deployment, security maintenance and responsibility for future changes. |
WordPress is often the practical choice for websites that need established publishing features, a familiar editor and a broad plugin ecosystem. It can also support structured content and custom functionality, so a bespoke platform is not automatically necessary when requirements become more detailed.
A custom CMS becomes more attractive when the application is primarily a structured content-management tool, when editorial workflows are unusually specialised, or when content needs to be delivered to several systems under defined rules.
I can assess the requirements against WordPress and other suitable approaches before recommending a solution. The goal is to make content easier to manage without taking on more custom software than the project needs.
A custom CMS should make publishing more straightforward, keep content consistent and give editors the controls they need without exposing unnecessary technical complexity.
I start by understanding the content, the people who maintain it and the destinations that use it. That helps establish whether the right solution is an existing CMS, a customised platform, a headless content architecture or a fully bespoke application.
The scope should also account for migration, editor training, testing, deployment and ongoing maintenance. These practical requirements matter just as much as the initial feature list.
You do not need a complete technical brief. I can review how your team creates, edits, approves and publishes content, then help define a practical scope before development begins.
I start by understanding the work the system needs to support. I keep decisions clear as the project moves from initial planning into development and launch.
I map the users, information, hand-offs and problems the software needs to solve.
I define the core features, data, integrations and a realistic first release with you.
I develop and test the application, then review it against real tasks and your feedback.
I help get the system live and plan sensible improvements as your requirements evolve.
Guidance on bespoke CMS development, structured content, editorial workflows and choosing the right content platform.
Verified client reviews on PeoplePerHour. Let’s make your project the next one.